PFAS Contamination by State: Where Forever Chemicals Are Worst
The most direct measure of which states have the most PFAS in their water is EPA's own testing of public water systems. From 2023 to 2025 EPA had about 10,000 public water systems tested for PFAS, and the share over its new 4 ppt limit for PFOA or PFOS was highest in Connecticut and New Jersey (44% each), then Delaware, Florida and South Carolina (about one in three). Only seven states and Washington, D.C. had no tested system over the limit. Below is your state's number, your state's own limit, and how to look up the result for your own town.

Quick Answer
In EPA's nationwide PFAS testing, 1,127 of 10,128 public water systems (11%) had PFOA or PFOS at or above the 4 ppt limit, and Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware, Florida and South Carolina had the highest shares.
- The next tier. Massachusetts, Rhode Island, North Carolina and Pennsylvania had about one tested system in four over the limit. See which states have the most PFAS.
- State limits. New Jersey, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and New York set their own PFAS limits before EPA did, and Vermont adopted EPA's numbers on January 1, 2026. Until 2029 your utility answers to your state's limit, if it has one. See your state's limit.
- Your own town. The results for every system EPA tested are public and searchable by name. See how to find your town's PFAS results.
- Private wells. No federal limit covers a private well, so only a lab test tells you. See PFAS in private wells.
What's in This Guide
Which states have the most PFAS in water?
Connecticut and New Jersey had the highest share of public water systems over EPA's 4 ppt limit for PFOA or PFOS, at 44% each. These numbers come from UCMR 5, the nationwide PFAS testing EPA ran from 2023 to 2025. It covered every water system serving more than 3,300 people plus a sample of smaller ones, and EPA released the final results in August 2026.
The numbers here count a system once if any of its sampling points averaged 4 ppt or more of PFOA or PFOS, the same way EPA's own summary counts them. The last column is the systems at 12 ppt or more, three times the limit.
| State | Systems tested | Over 4 ppt | 12 ppt or more |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut | 63 | 28 (44%) | 4 |
| New Jersey | 258 | 114 (44%) | 23 |
| Delaware | 36 | 12 (33%) | 4 |
| Florida | 394 | 127 (32%) | 60 |
| South Carolina | 154 | 49 (32%) | 5 |
| Massachusetts | 260 | 75 (29%) | 7 |
| Rhode Island | 29 | 8 (28%) | 1 |
| North Carolina | 277 | 68 (24%) | 18 |
| Pennsylvania | 386 | 93 (24%) | 28 |
| California | 685 | 129 (19%) | 74 |
| Alabama | 302 | 56 (18%) | 32 |
| Maryland | 82 | 15 (18%) | 3 |
| New Hampshire | 51 | 9 (18%) | 0 |
| Arizona | 150 | 22 (15%) | 9 |
| Ohio | 343 | 37 (11%) | 7 |
| All U.S. tested | 10,128 | 1,127 (11%) | 349 |
A few things to keep in mind. A small state with few systems moves a lot on a handful of results: Delaware's 33% is 12 systems out of 36. A big state with many systems can look low: Texas had 27 systems over the limit, but out of 1,124 tested. Michigan, which has its own limits, had one of the lowest shares (5 of 319). EPA's own estimate for the whole country, weighted to account for the small systems it did not test, is 7.8% of systems over a PFAS limit, and 15.5% of large systems serving more than 10,000 people.
Every state's UCMR 5 result
| State | Systems tested | Over 4 ppt | Percent over 4 ppt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 302 | 56 | 18% |
| Alaska | 28 | 2 | 7% |
| Arizona | 150 | 22 | 15% |
| Arkansas | 170 | 0 | 0% |
| California | 685 | 129 | 19% |
| Colorado | 162 | 4 | 2% |
| Connecticut | 63 | 28 | 44% |
| Delaware | 36 | 12 | 33% |
| District of Columbia | 3 | 0 | 0% |
| Florida | 394 | 127 | 32% |
| Georgia | 253 | 27 | 11% |
| Hawaii | 45 | 0 | 0% |
| Idaho | 61 | 2 | 3% |
| Illinois | 485 | 13 | 3% |
| Indiana | 229 | 6 | 3% |
| Iowa | 147 | 0 | 0% |
| Kansas | 103 | 3 | 3% |
| Kentucky | 230 | 9 | 4% |
| Louisiana | 261 | 1 | 0% |
| Maine | 40 | 2 | 5% |
| Maryland | 82 | 15 | 18% |
| Massachusetts | 260 | 75 | 29% |
| Michigan | 319 | 5 | 2% |
| Minnesota | 196 | 10 | 5% |
| Mississippi | 234 | 5 | 2% |
| Missouri | 229 | 6 | 3% |
| Montana | 44 | 0 | 0% |
| Nebraska | 53 | 3 | 6% |
| Nevada | 54 | 3 | 6% |
| New Hampshire | 51 | 9 | 18% |
| New Jersey | 258 | 114 | 44% |
| New Mexico | 72 | 1 | 1% |
| New York | 329 | 32 | 10% |
| North Carolina | 277 | 68 | 24% |
| North Dakota | 37 | 0 | 0% |
| Ohio | 343 | 37 | 11% |
| Oklahoma | 160 | 8 | 5% |
| Oregon | 127 | 10 | 8% |
| Pennsylvania | 386 | 93 | 24% |
| Puerto Rico | 99 | 17 | 17% |
| Rhode Island | 29 | 8 | 28% |
| South Carolina | 154 | 49 | 32% |
| South Dakota | 49 | 1 | 2% |
| Tennessee | 273 | 17 | 6% |
| Texas | 1,124 | 27 | 2% |
| Utah | 129 | 2 | 2% |
| Vermont | 38 | 0 | 0% |
| Virginia | 167 | 13 | 8% |
| Washington | 246 | 20 | 8% |
| West Virginia | 103 | 11 | 11% |
| Wisconsin | 202 | 19 | 9% |
| Wyoming | 33 | 0 | 0% |
Why PFAS maps rank states differently
A PFAS map counts places, not the share of a state's water over the limit. The EWG PFAS map, from an environmental advocacy group, puts every water system with any PFAS detected on the same map as industrial and military sites: 9,728 sites in its March 5, 2026 update. EPA publishes its own map, the PFAS Analytic Tools. A state with many sites on a map will not always rank high on tested water over EPA's limit, so the two lists will not match. For the water you drink, the UCMR 5 numbers above and your utility's own results are the ones that matter.
Does my state have its own PFAS limit?
Several states set their own enforceable PFAS limits before EPA did, and until 2029 a utility answers to its state's limit, if it has one. EPA's 4 ppt limits for PFOA and PFOS apply in every state, but utilities have until April 26, 2029 to meet them. These are the states with their own numbers or a recent change:
| Who sets it | Limit in ppt | Status today |
|---|---|---|
| EPA (every state) | PFOA 4.0, PFOS 4.0; PFHxS, PFNA and GenX 10 each; a combined score (Hazard Index) of 1 for mixtures | Utilities must meet it by April 26, 2029. Changes proposed in May 2026 are not final; see the latest on the federal rule. |
| New Jersey | PFOA 14, PFOS 13, PFNA 13 | The first enforceable PFAS limit in the U.S., in 2018. Private wells are tested for all three when a home is sold or leased. |
| Massachusetts | 20 for six PFAS added together ("PFAS6") | In force. |
| Michigan | PFNA 6, PFOA 8, PFOS 16, PFHxS 51, GenX 370, PFBS 420, PFHxA 400,000 | In force on the state's page, but in court: in September 2025 a Michigan appeals court again sided with 3M, which sued over how the rules were adopted. The state has asked the Michigan Supreme Court to hear the case. |
| New Hampshire | PFOA 12, PFOS 15, PFHxS 18, PFNA 11 | Written into state law. |
| Pennsylvania | PFOA 14, PFOS 18 | Adopted January 2023. |
| New York | PFOA 10, PFOS 10 | In force since 2020. In June 2026 the legislature passed a bill to lower both to 4 ppt; the state's bill record does not show it signed into law. |
| Vermont | EPA's numbers: PFOA 4.0, PFOS 4.0, plus the Hazard Index | In force since January 1, 2026. |
| Rhode Island | 20 for six PFAS added together | Interim state standard. Systems over 70 ppt had to tell customers not to drink the water. |
| Wisconsin | EPA's numbers | State rule matching EPA's took effect July 1, 2026. |
| Delaware | EPA's numbers | Written into state code; takes effect April 26, 2029. |
| California | Notification levels (above them, utilities must tell customers): PFOA 4.0 and PFOS 4.0 since October 29, 2025, down from 5.1 and 6.5. Response levels: PFOA 10, PFOS 40 | Guidance levels, not enforceable limits. |
| Connecticut | PFOA 16, PFOS 10, PFNA 12, PFHxS 49, GenX 19 | Action levels: guidelines, not enforceable limits. |
After April 26, 2029, EPA's 4 ppt limits for PFOA and PFOS apply in every state, including the ones with higher state numbers.
How to find PFAS results for your town
If your city water system serves more than 3,300 people, its PFAS results from EPA's testing are already public. Three places to look, in order:
-
Search EPA's PFAS results for your utility
Look up your water system by name in EPA's UCMR 5 Data Finder. It shows each PFAS your utility tested for and what it found. EPA lists results in micrograms per liter, where 0.004 is 4 ppt.
-
Read your annual water quality report
Utilities that found PFAS in that testing had to list it in their water quality report (the Consumer Confidence Report). Starting in 2027, every community system puts its PFAS results there.
-
Test your tap water
Your utility's results come from its own sampling points, not your tap. When a caller in Florida on city water asked me about PFAS, I said: "I would, uh, have a local testing lab check for PFAS." Our PFAS water test kit ($349) is a lab test for 14 PFAS by EPA Method 537.1.
PFAS in private wells
EPA's PFAS limits cover public water systems only, so a private well gets tested for PFAS only when its owner has it tested. New Jersey is the exception: a well has to be tested for PFOA, PFOS and PFNA when the home is sold or leased.
Wells are not safe from it because they are not on city water. In USGS's tap water study, at least one PFAS turned up in 40% of public-supply taps and 20% of private wells, at about the same levels in both. A well owner in New York with an old Air Force base down the road told me, "they test for PFOs now."
The complete well water test we sell does not include PFAS. A caller in Pennsylvania read me the answer off our page: "It says, 'Does this include PFAs and radiologicals?' And it says, 'No.'" The PFAS water test kit is the one that measures it.
Text me your PFAS numbers
Send a photo of the lab report or your utility's results. I will tell you which numbers are over EPA's limits and what I would do next.
8 AM to 5 PM Eastern, seven days a week. A real person, not a call center.PFAS near military bases
EPA lists firefighting foam, used in training and emergencies at military bases and airports, as a source of PFAS in drinking water. The foam the military used is called AFFF. The Defense Department's PFAS site tracks its investigation and cleanup at current and former military installations, with a progress chart updated through June 30, 2026, and a "PFAS Cleanup in Your Area" section. If you live near a base, check there first, then look up your water system or test your well as described above.
What to do if your PFAS is high
If your result is over 4 ppt for PFOA or PFOS, EPA's advice to well owners is to consider other water for drinking, cooking and baby formula, and a home filter certified to lower PFAS. On city water, your utility has to get under EPA's limit by 2029, and under your state's limit sooner if your state has one.
Reverse osmosis, activated carbon and PFAS resin all reduce PFAS. When people call me with a PFAS result, most of them go with carbon: "Carbon, most of our customers use carbon." None of the whole-house tanks or reverse osmosis units we sell is certified for PFAS; the one PFAS-certified item we sell is the Pentair FloPlus Protect 20BB cartridge. How to weigh carbon, resin and RO for your numbers is its own page: choosing a PFAS water filter. Our PFAS water filters are all on one page.
Frequently asked questions
What is the latest news on PFAS today?
As of October 24, 2026, EPA's April 2024 PFAS limits are still the law. In May 2026 EPA proposed letting utilities that ask have until April 2031 instead of 2029, with any utility that gets the extra time and has a PFOA or PFOS result of 12 ppt or more required to take short-term steps to cut exposure. It also proposed dropping the limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the mixture score. Comments closed July 20, 2026; neither change is final. The federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. heard the water utilities' challenge to the rule on September 18, 2026.
What are the recommended levels of PFAS in drinking water?
EPA's health goal for PFOA and PFOS is zero. Its enforceable limit is 4.0 ppt each because that is the lowest level labs can reliably measure. On a lab report, ppt and nanograms per liter (ng/L) are the same unit, and 1 ppb is 1,000 ppt.
What are the main sources of PFAS contamination?
EPA names factories that make or use PFAS, firefighting foam used at airports, military bases and fire training sites, landfills and hazardous waste sites, and treated sewage sludge spread on farm fields. For more on where it comes from and what it does, see PFAS in drinking water.
Can you flush PFAS out of your body?
There is no approved medical treatment to lower PFAS in the body, according to ATSDR, the federal health agency for toxic substances. What you can control is how much more you take in, and with PFAS in your water that starts with what you drink and cook with.
Aidan Walsh
Co-owner & Residential Water Treatment Specialist, Mid Atlantic WaterAidan Walsh has spent 32 years in residential water treatment, the first stretch of it installing and servicing well systems before Mid Atlantic Water became an online supplier. Mid Atlantic Water is a family company; every recommendation on this site is based on what actually failed in the field and what fixed it. If you have a question this page did not answer, call 800-460-5810 or text him at 443-277-2204.
Aidan answers calls and texts 8 AM to 5 PM Eastern, every day.Number copied. Text it from your phone: 443-277-2204.